A commonwealth judge has chose to trim insurance claims from Jennifer Eckhart yet ruled the she plausibly alleges the network should have known about sexually harassing behavior.

You are watching: Ed henry fox news what happened


*

Thanks to a ruling on Thursday,Jennifer Eckhart will have the ability to proceed in a lawsuit against Fox News over its responsibility for a correspondent’s sex-related misconduct.

Eckhart, a previous associate producer on Fox company Network, alleges she endured years of sexual harassment consisting of lewd messages from Ed Henry, the Fox News’ previous White house correspondent. She additional alleges being coerced right into a sexual relationship and also that it culminated in violent rape in a hotel room. Henry to be fired together a result of her charges, but the termination wasn’t sufficient to prevent Eckhart native going come court versus Fox News.


U.S. Ar Court referee Ronnie Abrams sees sufficient in her complaint to permit a case for harassment under new York State human Rights Law, back the judge is dismissing a second claim because that sex trafficking.


Related Stories


*

TV

Bret Baier: "There to be Concerns" about Tucker Carlson Doc That caused Contributor Resignations


*

TV

TV Ratings: World collection Ends With second Smallest Audience Ever


According come the 52-page opinion (read here), lot of Henry’s alleged abuse falls external of the statute of limitations, but there’s enough from 2018 to carry her fit under brand-new York legislation (if not Title VII) for now.

In enabling a enemy workplace claim, Abrams points to allegations that it to be an “open secret” that Henry was a “serial harasser,” that Fox News had received a former complaint about him, and that the law firm that Paul, Weiss had conducted an inner investigation right into sexual harassment in the wake up of allegations versus former Fox News chief roger Ailes.

The referee rules the these allegations “suffice, in ~ this stage, to create that Fox News knew or should have actually known of Henry’s misconduct.”

Additionally, Eckhart is allowed an additional claim because that retaliation in response to she termination. She may also pursue limited claims versus Henry himself.

See more: Does Patrick Mahomes Have A Daughter, Patrick Mahomes' Parents Molded A Superstar Qb

This is just one of two rulings this particular day on the sex-related misconduct front against Fox News. In a second ruling, judge Abrams rejects cases from Cathy Areu, who when regularly showed up on Fox News and made a slew of accusations against network master Howie Kurtz, Tucker Carlson and also Sean Hannity. Abrams rule Areu is not a extended employee and thus can’t support assorted employment claims, return the judge declines to award penalty demanded by the defendants.

In a statement ~ the judgment was released, a Fox News spokesperson commented, “While we room pleased referee Abrams ruled in donate of our activity to dismiss the Cathy Areu case, we stay committed to defending versus the baseless allegations versus Fox outlined in Jennifer Eckhart’s claims. Together we have actually previously stated, upon very first learning the Ms. Eckhart’s allegations against Ed Henry, Fox News Media immediately commenced a thorough independent investigation and also within 6 days dismissed Mr. Henry because that cause. Us look front to proving with the discovery process that Fox News Media take away harassment allegations seriously and also acted appropriately.”