"Compromised," by Peter Strzok. (Courtesy houghton Mifflin Harcourt)This short article is an ext than 1 year old.The previous FBI agent whom President Trump once accused the treason is out with a brand-new book that claims Trump is a risk to national security.

You are watching: Does russia have something on trump

Peter Strzok, previous deputy the the FBI counterintelligence division, to be at the heart of investigations into Hillary Clinton’s email server and the 2016 trumped campaign’s ties to Russia.

He was later on kicked off unique counsel Robert Mueller’s team and also fired indigenous the FBI end disparaging texts he sent out to FBI lawyer Lisa Page about Trump. And in his new book, "Compromised: Counterintelligence and also the danger of Donald J. Trump,” Strzok says that trump is compromised and doing Russia’s bidding.

“I think specifically when you look at several of his financial entanglements and other things that the has actively sought to hide, the if you"re a international intelligence service, if you"re somebody like the Russian knowledge services or the Chinese or anybody else,” the says, “that same information provides you tremendous leverage end being able to influence somebody.”

Russia’s influence over Trump explains some that the “inexplicable things” the president has done in regard come Russia, Strzok says, including his fail to contact out Russians for placing bounties ~ above American soldiers in Afghanistan and also his quiet on the attempted assassination of Russian dissident Alexei Navalny.

“Just time and time again, trump is law these things that space inexplicably not in America"s nationwide security interests, but do benefit Russia,” Strzok says. “And i think the compromise describes that.”

Strzok claims he feel compelled to write this book to set the record straight top top those investigations right into Trump and also Hillary Clinton that so considerably influenced the 2016 presidential election and also the political discourse to this day. When he doesn’t think he will be maybe to readjust everyone’s psychic on Trump, Strzok claims he thinks his publication will do a difference.

“What us are facing is too critical,” that says. “This is too daunting a time to remain silent, and also so over there is small question in my mind that ns felt I needed to compose the book.”

Interview Highlights 

On even if it is Trump has company dealings with Russia

“Well, i think the document is clear the he does. If friend look going ago to his campaign, there to be a number of statements that, girlfriend know, prior to that one of his sons was talking around the disproportionate lot of the Trump structure and trump group"s gaue won holdings that were hosted by Russia. If you look at the action of his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, going roughly seeking a transaction for a trumped Tower in Moscow — in ~ the same time Cohen is doing that, trumped is ~ above the campaign trail saying he has no ties come Russia. Well, that"s plainly a lie. That"s clearly false. At the moment Vladimir Putin clearly knew that. Trump card knew that. The FBI knew that. Yet the American windy didn"t. For this reason to keep that lie a secret gives — and gave — Russia leverage end him.”

On why the president has actually not faced after-effects despite evidence 

“That"s a an excellent question. Ns think you have to look at it 2 ways. The very first is that Mueller"s examination was really focused top top a narrow collection of criminal violations including his interaction with the government of Russia at the moment and period leading up to the election. If you step back, though, if girlfriend look in ~ the bipartisan Senate intel report, the paints a broad snapshot of interactions in between not just Trump but the entirety of his campaign and also Russia. And from an knowledge perspective, it"s clear that that image is much more comprehensive and lot deeper and also far more concerning than the border of what Mueller to be tasked come do.”

On whether investigations into Trump to be consequential

“In my opinion, the did bring about something. Friend can"t measure outcomes in terms of strictly charges and also convictions. You need to look at and understand what is walk on there. Now, I have actually a lot of of concern that the wide counterintelligence watch of the form that the Senate Intel Committee walk was no ever totally explored by anybody in the executive branch. And also I think it"s absolutely an essential that that is done. And if the hasn"t been, that it is handle in the future.”

On how he would certainly respond come accusations the he functions to threaten Trump

“Well, i think that"s an absurd accusation. Look, the reality of the matter is the I and others ~ above the team in the autumn of 2016 had huge knowledge, i m sorry was not publicly known, that had actually we disclosed it, would have actually absolutely torpedoed Trump"s candidacy. The fact of the issue is come this day, I and others understand things that would be damaging to Trump that would certainly hurt him best now. And yet none of us have spoken about it. Therefore it"s clear that there wasn"t some attempt to threaten his candidacy or his presidency. Is this the idea of personal opinions? Every single FBI agent has actually a an individual political opinion. I"m no different. But every day, my experience over 20 years is that world walk in the door and also they perform their job. Whether that"s in the FBI, even if it is that"s in the secret Service, even if it is it"s in the CIA, the department of State or anywhere else in the government, that is absolutely component of the way that the professional government employee carries the end their duties on a work in, day out basis.”

On the things he knows that can damage the president 

“Well, I"m obviously not going to get into them. There are things that space still definitely classified. There are things that could be quiet under investigation. However the reality of the issue is that those things exist and they"re accordingly not discussed. And also so v that in mind, it absolutely refutes — and also of those points that are now known — the situations on all the world that we had actually under investigation, all the reasons why we were looking in ~ them, every the points that are had in the Mueller report and in the Senate intel report, we knew plenty of of those points throughout the autumn of 2016, however nobody claimed anything around them.

“All of them would have actually been extremely damaging to Trump. And yet they never ever came out. And also that"s if anything, that"s straight evidence that us were not out to get Trump. And also if anything, we"ve bent end backwards to make certain we didn"t harm him or his candidacy.”

On the problem at the FBI neighboring public statements about Clinton and also Trump’s campaigns

“I think it was, hopefully, a historic and only time we ever before have investigations including both of the candidates for the presidency. But they"re very different investigations. And if you want to know the distinction in the way they were handled, the examination that associated Secretary of State Clinton was a criminal issue that had been largely recognized to the public and also was finish in July. That was in a really different ar in regards to being in the public dialog, being subject to oversight and file requests and visibility v Congress together opposed to the investigate we had on those people about the trump card campaign, which were counterintelligence in nature. They certainly had some criminal aspects. Castle were all classified. Castle were all ongoing. Lock weren"t however closed. And they"re all very, really sensitive. So ns understand world look in ~ those 2 cases and also say, ‘Wow, these had a really different, very disparate influence on every of the candidates.’ however that was appropriate given wherein those instances were. And also again, I"d point out the method that those cases, the FBI either did or did not discuss them, universally across the board tended to hurt candidate Clinton and help candidate Trump.”

On exactly how Russia readjusted the outcome of the election 

“I think ~ a most retrospective thought, as soon as you look in ~ the election whereby the variety of swing voters, according to FiveThirtyEight, in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan and also Pennsylvania, required to change the Electoral university outcome could fit in one football stadium and also one game. You don"t need a lot to relocate that needle. And unfortunately, ns think, together I look back, as I"ve heard others look back, i think through the advantage of hindsight — i beg your pardon is an difficult standard — yet when i look in ~ that, ns think I absolutely would have advocated an ext strongly to no make that speech in July.

“As to the Russians, absolutely. I think they had an affect and adjusted the result of the election. What they did in such a comprehensive method in society media, in the things that they were doing to strike our poll infrastructure and casting doubt top top any variety of social issues, for sure was efficient enough to sway such a small number of voters the were required to change the outcome.”

On if the Russians room interfering in the 2020 election

“They are. They"re doing that now, and also they"re going to proceed to do it increase through and also past our election. Spring at every the worries that are going to be under debate, even if it is those are social stress points in between Black Lives matter or Blue Lives matter or Antifa or the efficacy the mail-in voting, but certainly afterward, questioning whether or not the outcomes of the vote were legitimate, and I expect that they room now and also will be proactively involved in make the efforts to turn up the heat and encourage dissent within the American public.”

On whether the FBI and other agencies are all set for Russian choice interference this time around 

“I think the FBI is lot better. I think ~ 2016, I understand that a fusion cell that sorts, that a group taking every these different counterintelligence and also cyber and also organized crime groups and putting them all together to look in ~ this issue was created. That helps. That"s walking to enhance things.

“What I problem deeply around is there is no a comprehensive, coordinated totality of government method to tackling this issue. Friend think ago to, you know, public reporting the when former Secretary the Homeland defense Kirstjen Nielsen make the efforts to carry up the topic in ~ the White residence of acquiring the federal government together to talk about this issue, she was essentially cautioned no to point out that in front of president Trump because he would end up being furious. Therefore if that"s the tone that"s coming from the top, the only means you have the right to coordinate this solution effectively is from the White home through the . I"m confident the didn"t occur, and I"m confident the America is weaker since of it.”

On even if it is he think his publication will readjust people’s minds around Trump

“I think it will make a difference. Ns mean, clearly, over there are civilization who are already collection in your opinions, yet there are world who space open-minded. Over there are people who space still do the efforts to comprise their mind what lock think, and also beyond simply the vote, beyond simply the choice that"s coming up, I want to create a story that provided a factual, exact recounting not only of everything that us did with the food of the Clinton email investigation, what we did in 2016 with regard to Trump, however to give human being an understanding of just how the Russians work from the perspective of a counterintelligence expert who spent more than two decades working this, come convey the idea and also the method that a CIA human would think around what is going on now and think about how to recognize what Russia is and also will proceed to do.”

On even if it is his downfall to be justified by his text messages come Lisa Page

“Yeah, I know that perspective. And look, ns deeply remorse the means that some actions have actually been offered to attack the points I love the many — my job, the FBI, my family, first and foremost — however at the exact same time, i think that as soon as you look at the means that this to be turned into a weapon, the means that the an individual nature of some of these assaults have to be done in a way that us haven"t seen prior to in ours history. And it"s not simply me. Ns mean, look in ~ the way that anyone who has actually come out through weaknesses or not, native Col. Vindman come Ambassador Yovanovitch to the unnamed whistleblower, time and time again, human being who room doing nothing various other than informing the reality at a reduced level, doing their duty, room being assaulted in a personal way by this administration, in a means that we"ve never ever seen before. So, friend know, it deeply troubles me that, friend know, I serve as an example of several of the just outrageous actions by this administration. But I think we must look at the cause of what"s behind that.”

On whether the Trump management is obstructing investigations right into its behavior

“I think the administration"s behavior right currently is plainly having a chilling influence on what is gift investigated and what is not being investigated or looked right into or having actually intelligence gathered throughout the U.S. Government. Over there is no way, once you have actually the attorney general saying that the investigate in 2016 were completely without merit, the anybody is going come stick your neck out and also feel that they deserve to go aggressively and with part risk, look into acts that developed with Trump and also the Russians or almost everywhere else. It absolutely is chilling. That"s the intent and that"s the goal. And also so i do concern that and also I"m very curious that, whether it"s in, girlfriend know, five months or 53 months, whatever the next administration does, to look back and try and know what happened. Ns think it"s vital that we execute that since there is an extraordinary amount of concerning actions here that we owe it to ourselves as a country to get to the bottom of and also understand.”

Emiko Tamagawa produced and also edited this interview because that broadcast v Todd Mundt. Samantha Raphelson adapted it for the web.

Book Excerpt: "Compromised"

By Peter Strzok


EARLY IN 2017, quickly after the inauguration that the 45th chairman of the united States, the top management of the FBI’s Counterintelligence division filed into a small room top top the 4th floor the the J. Edgar Hoover Building. A weak midwinter light shone with the broad plate-glass home windows over- spring Pennsylvania Avenue. The room, tucked away turn off a edge of the Bureau’s counterintelligence front office, was booked for high-level briefings and especially perceptible debates. Meetings like the one that was about to start.

Peter Strzok. (Joshua Cogan)

I take it a seat opposite the door, dealing with a lengthy whiteboard, around eight feet vast and four feet high, which inhabited one side of the room. Across the broad surface, names were very closely written in erasable marker. At the top, I read the initials “DJT” written in small blue letters. Below that to be names familiar to every one of us in the room, some of which shortly would become known come the American public. Paul Manafort. George Papadopoulos. Mike Flynn. Carter Page.

All the names on the whiteboard belonged to civilization inside the Trump management or associated to it. All had something in common: we had received credible counterintelligence allegations versus each individual. We had already opened investigations into some of them. There were various other names on the board together well, belonging to people for whom us didn’t have open cases, back by regulation us had more than enough evidence to execute so. Opened those situations was the subject of ongoing dispute — a back- and-forth that sometimes thrived heated.

It was a very daunting time, and we still had actually many much more questions 보다 answers. On that day us grappled with specifically troubling question, one the none that us can have anticipated in ours wildest imaginations: even if it is to open a counterintelligence case against the chairman himself.

Over the food of the previous year presidential campaign, and in the after-effects of the 2016 election, involves within the FBI’s Counterintelligence division about Trump and his advisers had grown steadily into outright alarm. In so late December 2016, the director of national knowledge published a report confirming knowledge we had been receiving through- out the presidential campaign: the Vladimir Putin and the Russian government were interfering v our electoral device to undermine confidence in the election, hurt Hillary Clinton’s prospects, and assist Trump get elected.

Those of united state gathered in the room at FBI headquarters that day also knew the the Russians had pulled several of their punches; we had actually credible knowledge that Russia possessed the method to have done even much more damage to our electoral system in 2016 but had hosted back. The expertise that they had something in to make reservation to potentially use versus us in the run-up come our next presidential election only made the atmosphere in the little conference room that lot tenser.

The stress and uncertainty of the past several months weighed greatly on every one of us. Ns was proud of just how our team had actually responded to the pressure. We preserved our professionalism and confidentiality, maintaining a quiet discipline as us went about the unprecedented task at hand. Still, a grim stoicism hung over our work. Over there was little levity; this to be nothing to hoax about. We never questioned how it influenced us personally, yet we common an unspoken feeling of straff apprehension over the enormity the the events prior to us. There to be a quiet acknowledgment: I know, ns feel it too. Let’s store driving forward.

For plenty of months before this moment, i had likewise been immersed in an- various other politically delicate case. Due to the fact that August 2015, I had actually supervised the FBI investigation right into whether Hillary Clinton had mishandled share email during her tenure together secretary that state. Toward the end of that investigation — i m sorry culminated in a weekend interview v Secretary Clinton just before July 4, 2016 — i sat v the core team of our team to testimonial our findings. One through one, ns asked each member if that or she believed there were any type of remaining investigative threads the might readjust our an essential understanding the the case. And also then i asked them, one by one, even if it is they were comfortable with the decision not to recommend criminal charges. The answer was unanimous and also unequivocal: we had actually done a complete and also exhaustive investigation, and the truth did not support bringing charges over the email.

But Trump to be a entirely different matter.

See more: Does Big Ang Have Lung Cancer Days Before Her Death, Big Ang Dead: Dr

By the moment Trump was sworn in, the FBI had actually been investigating Russian election interference for almost six month — and also what the office knew about the instances was far different from what the general public did. The general public knew the the FBI had actually investigated Clinton, however even within the bureau very couple of people were aware of our investigations right into Russian interference. And if the American world had well-known what us did at the time of the election, they would have been appalled.