The California supreme Court, shown during remote arguments last year, declined to overhaul the state’s fatality penalty regulation in a judgment Thursday.

You are watching: Does calif have the death penalty


SAN FRANCISCO—The California can be fried Court top top Thursday decided to leave the state’s fatality penalty legislation intact, refusing an entreaty native Gov. Gavin Newsom that would have overturned scores of death sentences.

In a unanimous decision, the state’s highest court said there was small legal support under state legislation for overhauling the law, as adversaries of capital punishment urged. In fact, the court said, few of the precedents quote by defense lawyers actually undercut their position.

Defense lawyers had suggested the state’s capital punishment law was unconstitutional because it failed to require jurors to unanimously agree beyond a reasonable doubt top top the reasons why a defendant need to be sentenced to death instead that life without opportunity of parole.

A decision to impose the fatality penalty also should it is in made beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard currently used in deciding guilt, the lawyers said.


Advertisement

If the court had actually agreed, hundreds — if no all — death sentences would have had to it is in overturned due to the fact that such decisions generally use retroactively.


*

California

California’s optimal court weighs overturning hundreds of fatality penalty sentences


Hundreds of fatality penalty sentence in California might be overturned, depending on how the state can be fried Court rules on disagreements it heard Wednesday.


Justice Goodwin Liu, that wrote the ruling, stated some the the situations cited through defense attorneys go not support their position. “If anything,” that said, they suggested “the ultimate penalty determination is entirely within the discretion the the jury.”

The court go not disapprove the constitutional debates raised by Newsom however said they go “not bear directly on the particular state regulation questions before us.”


In a concurring opinion, Liu stated there was enough U.S. Supreme Court precedent to warrant reconsidering California’s fatality penalty rule in future cases. He noted that some other states have adjusted their capital punishment demands as a an outcome of much more recent supreme Court rulings top top the 6th Amendment, i m sorry protects the trial rights of the criminally accused.

“Although today’s decision does not revisit this issue, I think the concern should it is in reexamined in a instance where it is more fully developed,” Liu wrote. “The constitutionality the our death penalty system in irradiate of two decades of evolving 6th Amendment jurisprudence deserves careful and also thorough reconsideration.”

The issue occurred in an appeal brought by condemned inmate Don’te Lamont McDaniel, convicted of killing two world in 2004 and also wounding 2 witnesses in a drug problem at south Los Angeles’ Nickerson Gardens public housing project. The deceased were 33-year-old George Brooks and Brooks’ 52-year-old cousin, Annette Anderson.

The court instead upheld his fatality sentence Thursday.

In written disagreements to the court, Newsom assailed the death penalty as racist and cited research after research that found the mechanism discriminated versus Black and Latino defendants. That did no ask the court come abolish the fatality penalty, a move that voters have actually rejected, but to readjust how it to be administered.

The state high court has actually long dismissed some of the debates that death penalty enemies raised in McDaniel’s case. Yet death penalty supporters became worried as soon as the court asked because that written debates on the constitution questions.

The court likewise has adjusted substantially in recent years. 5 of the 7 justices were appointed through Newsom and also his predecessor, Gov. Jerry Brown, both adversaries of the death penalty.

John Mills, who stood for two scholar of the state Constitution together friends the the court, claimed the ruling and Liu’s concurrence have provided a road map for future challenges that might be an ext likely come succeed.

He predicted fatality row inmates will certainly soon bring the type of insurance claims that Liu said might be persuasive but were no at problem in McDaniel’s appeal.

“He was laying the end some concerns that were no presented by Mr. McDaniel around the operations of the California fatality penalty statue that he is concerned may hurt the commonwealth Constitution,” Mills said. “Those issues remain an open question in California due to the fact that they were no litigated in this case.”

Mills claimed the Legislature additionally could readjust the regulation to bring more fairness to the penalty step of death penalty trials through adopting brand-new rules.

See more: Did The Texans Stand For The National Anthem

California has an ext than 700 inmates on death row, however legal challenges have stymied executions. Just 13 inmates have been executed since 1992, and also Newsom implemented a moratorium on executions during his time in office.