On Monday morning, the United claims Supreme Court refused to hear a situation from California that allowed a public institution to ban American flag apparel worn through students.
You are watching: Do schools fly the american flag
The relocate seemingly upholds a precedent set in the late 1960s in the Tinker decision that college officials can censor college student passive complimentary speech if they feel the speech disrupts school activities.
On Friday, the judge met in private to take into consideration the case, which references several prominent an initial Amendment issues and reflects on the transforming demographics in 21st Century America.
The debate goes earlier to a might 2009 incident between two teams of students in ~ Live Oak High School. At a school-sponsored Cinco de mayo event, a Mexican-American college student walked approximately campus through the flag the Mexico and also other college student flew a makeshift United states flag in an answer and chanted in ~ the flag-bearing student. Students on both political parties complained around the incident.
A year later, numerous students involved school top top Cinco de mei wearing American flag shirts and school officials called the college student to remove the American flag shirts, or rotate the shirts within out. The educators claimed the American flag shirts can send a article that would certainly offend the Cinco de mei celebrants and also they had actually public safety and security concerns.
The parents of the American flag-wearing students sued on their behalf, alleging first Amendment violate by the Morgan Hill school District.
The federal nine Circuit Court ruled in favor of Morgan Hill school District. The reduced courts stated that the educators' American flag apparel ban didn’t hurt a standard set in the well known Tinker case.
In the Tinker v. Des Moines instance of 1969, the supreme Court claimed that student “don’t burned their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression in ~ the schoolhouse gate.” The Court likewise said in Tinker the educators have the right to take censorship action against student if “students’ tasks would materially and also substantially disrupt the work and also discipline the the school.”
In this brand-new case, the lawyers for the students claim the nine Circuit is trying to readjust this definition, through restricting passive very first Amendment speech. And also in fact, the student’s attorneys speak the Court must make it clear the American flag display screens of any type shouldn’t it is in banned at public schools.
“There is never a legit basis for banning the screen of an American flag on one American public institution campus. And also by incentivizing and financially rewarding violence as a legitimate an answer to unpopular speech, the 9th Circuit’s decision is contrary to our foundational very first Amendment principles and provides a dangerous lesson in civics come our public school students,” castle claim.
Morgan Hill’s lawyers say the teacher made the correct decisions based upon the rule created in the Tinker case.
“School public official on the scene had actually ample factor to believe violence and disruption were around to happen. Institution officials throughout the nation act against a background of the should prevent another Santee, Columbine, Littleton, or any of the thousands of school shootings that have actually happened since Tinker to be decided,” the Morgan Hill lawyers argue.
They additionally believe the instance isn’t a referendum on paris the American flag at public schools.
See more: Did John Travolta Sing In Grease, John Travolta And Olivia Newton
“This categorical explain misstates the nature that this case, and also misreads the Constitutional worries involved,” the Morgan Hill lawyers argue. “According come Petitioners, the ordinary deference paid to school regulation of college student dress and expression must disappear at any time the flag is affiliated – even, here, once there is no flag involved, however clothing v a flag ’theme.’ there is no constitutional basis because that such a distinction, particularly in the paper definition of safety at schools.”
Two world who likewise wanted the situation decided through the can be fried Court space Mary Beth and John Tinker, the petitioners in the 1969 complimentary speech case.
“It is ironic the the student expression censured in this case involved a reflecting of respect because that the American flag,” the Tinkers said in your court brief. They fear that a judgment in donate of the school would send “a message that is the an extremely antithesis the the first Amendment: the speech have the right to be properly suppressed by danger of violence.”