It take it 400,000 Nasa employees and contractors to put Neil Armstrong and also Buzz Aldrin on the moon in 1969 – but only one male to spread out the idea the it was all a hoax. His surname was invoice Kaysing.

It began as “a hunch, one intuition”, before transforming into “a true conviction” – the the united state lacked the technological prowess to do it to the moon (or, in ~ least, to the moon and back). Kaysing had actually actually added to the US an are programme, albeit tenuously: between 1956 and also 1963, he to be an employee that Rocketdyne, a firm that helped to style the Saturn V rocket engines. In 1976, the self-published a pamphlet called We never ever Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty exchange rate Dollar Swindle, i beg your pardon sought proof for his conviction by method of grainy photocopies and ludicrous theories. Yet somehow he established a couple of perennials the are preserved alive to now in Hollywood movies and Fox News documentaries, Reddit forums and also YouTube channels.

You are watching: Did we walk on the moon

Despite the especially volume of evidence (including 382kg of moon rock collected across 6 missions; corroboration from Russia, Japan and also China; and images native the Nasa Lunar enlightenment Orbiter mirroring the tracks made by the astronauts in the moondust), belief in the moon-hoax conspiracy has actually blossomed because 1969. Amongst 9/11 truthers, anti-vaxxers, chemtrailers, flat-Earthers, Holocaust deniers and also Sandy Hook conspiracists, the idea that the moon landings were faked isn’t also a source of rage any an ext – it is just a provided fact.

The podcast kingpin Joe Rogan is among the doubters. So too is the YouTuber Shane Dawson. A sociology professor in new Jersey to be exposed critical year for telling his student the landings were fake. When Kaysing relied on photocopied samizdat to alert the world, now conspiracists have actually the sugreddit r/moonhoax to paper how Nasa to be “so lazy” it provided the very same moon rover because that Apollo 15, 16 and 17; or just how “they have been trolling united state for years”; or to carry up the reality there is “one thing I can’t gain my head approximately ...”

“The fact is, the internet has made it feasible for people to say every little thing the hell they like to a broader number of civilization than ever before before,” sighs roger Launius, a previous chief chronicler of Nasa. “And the truth is, americans love conspiracy theories. Every time something large happens, somebody has actually a counter-explanation.”


*

Bill Kaysing, the male who began the moon-hoax conspiracy. Photograph: www.billkaysing.comIt transforms out British human being love conspiracy theories, too. Last year, the daytime TV display This Morning welcomed a guest who suggested that no one might have go on the moon as the moon is made of light. Young name Kenny claimed: “In the past, you observed the moon landings and also there to be no way to check any kind of of it. Now, in the period of technology, a most young human being are currently investigating for themselves.” A recent YouGov poll uncovered that one in six British world agreed v the statement: “The moon landings were staged.” four per cent thought the hoax concept was “definitely true”, 12% the it to be “probably true”, with a further 9% registering together don’t knows. Moon hoaxism was much more prevalent among the young: 21 % the 24- to 35-year-olds agreed that the moon landings were staged, contrasted with 13% that over-55s.

Kaysing’s original queries are fuelling this. One is the reality that no stars are visible in the pictures; an additional is the absence of a blast crater under the landing module; a third is to perform with the means the shadows fall. People who understand what they room talking about have wasted hrs explaining together “anomalies” (they room to perform with, respectively, camera-exposure times, the method thrust functions in a vacuum and also the reflective attributes of moondust). Yet till his fatality in 2005, Kaysing preserved that the totality thing was a fraud, filmed in a TV studio. “It’s well documented that Nasa was often badly managed and had negative quality control,” he told Wired in 1994. “But as of 1969, we could suddenly perform manned trip upon manned flight? With finish success? that just versus all statistics odds.”

He to be right about that in ~ least. Once the Soviets introduced Sputnik 1 in October 1957 (followed one month later on by Sputnik 2, comprise Laika the dog), the US room programme was all but non-existent. Nasa was started in 1958 and also managed come launch Alan Shepard into room in might 1961 – however when man F Kennedy announced the the us “should commit chin to accomplish the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a male on the moon and returning him safely come the Earth”, it appeared a stretch. By the mid-60s, Nasa was consuming an ext than 4% the the united state federal budget, but while the Soviets to be achieving more firsts – the very first woman in space (1963), the an initial extra-vehicular activity, ie spacewalk (1965) – the americans experienced assorted setbacks, consisting of a launchpad fire that killed all three Apollo 1 astronauts.

If you have ever before been to the science Museum in London, you will understand that the lunar module was usually made of tinfoil. Apollo 8 had actually orbited the moon in 1968, but, together Armstrong remarked, correcting course and also landing top top the moon to be “far and also away the most complicated part the the flight”. The rated walking approximately on the surface one out of 10 for challenge (despite the troubles he had with the TV cable wrapping roughly his feet), “but I thought the lunar lower was probably a 13”.

That is until you to compare it through the an obstacle of keeping a lie to the entire people for five years without a single slip from any Nasa employee. You would likewise have come imagine the 2019-era special results were available to Nasa in 1969 and also not one of the 600 million TV viewers noticed anything amiss. Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A an are Odyssey (1968) is a kind indication of what Hollywood distinct effects could do at the moment – and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to movie on location.

See more: Did Michael Bloomberg Dropout Of The Presidential Race, Endorses Biden

If we pass end “World war two bomber uncovered on moon” – a Sunday sport front web page from 1988 – the moon-hoax theory gone into the contemporary era in 2001, as soon as Fox News broadcast a documentary referred to as Did we Land top top the Moon? organized by the X-Files actor Mitch Pileggi, it repackaged Kaysing’s debates for a brand-new audience. Launius, that was working at Nasa in ~ the time, recalls much banging of heads versus consoles. “For many years, us refused come respond to this stuff. It wasn’t worth giving it a hearing. Yet when Fox News aired the so-called documentary – stating unequivocally ‘We haven’t came down on the moon’ – it really elevated the level. We began to obtain all type of questions.”

Most that the call came not from conspiracists, yet from parents and also teachers. “People were saying: ‘My son saw this, exactly how do ns respond?’ So, with some trepidation, Nasa put up a webpage and sent the end some products to teachers.”

A particular bugbear in the Fox News documentary to be a poll claiming that 20% that Americans believed the moon landing was faked. Launius states that polls tend to put the figure at between 4% and 5%, but it’s basic to phrase poll concerns to accomplish a an ext eye-catching result. “Every time there’s a listening in a severe periodical – also an offhand comment in a movie – it just seeds this stuff.” that cites a scene in Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar (2014) in i beg your pardon a schoolteacher informs Matthew McConaughey’s character that the moon landings were hoaxed in bespeak to win the propaganda war against the Soviet Union. “It’s a throwaway in the film. But it really did churn up a big response.”

Oliver Morton, the writer of The Moon: A history for the Future, trust the persistence that the moon hoax isn’t surprising. Offered an implausible occasion for which there is lots of proof (Apollo 11) and a plausible event for which over there is zero proof (the moon hoax), some people will opt because that the latter. “The suggest of Apollo to be to display how an effective the American federal government was in terms of actually doing things,” he says. “The allude of moon-hoax concept is to present how powerful the American federal government was in regards to making people think things the weren’t true.” however the hoax narrative was only really feasible as Apollo never ever led all over – there were no more missions after 1972. “As the American mind turns back to paranoia in the 1970s, the becomes an ext pleasing to believe in this,” he says.