In 2002, Sen. Hillary Clinton of brand-new York voted come authorize the Iraq War; her rival for the autonomous nomination for president, vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, protest it. Clinton’s vote proceeds to haunt her on the project trail—and for great reason.

You are watching: Did hillary clinton vote for the iraq war

First, there room the after-effects of that illegal and unnecessary war: 4,500 American soldiers killed and also thousands more permanently disabled; numerous thousands of Iraqi deaths; the destabilization of the an ar with the increase of ISIS; and a dramatic rise in the federal deficit, result in significant cutbacks to crucial social programs.

Clinton’s vote, i beg your pardon she currently professes come regret, raises troubling implications about her function as a potential commander-in-chief.

The United nations Charter forbids member states from utilizing military force unless they are under direct assault or obtain explicit authorization through the U.N. Defense Council. (Customary global law allows for pre-emptive war, however only in situations of an unavoidable threat, such as troops massing along the border or missiles prepare to it is in launched.)

Clinton now claims the vote was just meant to press Saddam Hussein to allow inspectors earlier in and also that it had the support of Hans Blix, head of the U.N. Inspection team. However the invoice she supported in October 2002 gave President shrub blanket authority to attack Iraq. When he did for this reason in march 2003, in spite of inspectors having been in Iraq for over three months v unfettered accessibility to Iraqi facilities, she supported that decision.

Some Clinton pendant have defended her, saying she had actually received convincing intelligence data that Iraq had actually “weapons of massive destruction.” also if that had actually been the case, the war would still have been just as illegal and also just as unwise.

Furthermore, virtually all the alleged intelligence data made available to congress has since been declassified; most strategic analysts have discovered it transparently weak, based greatly on hearsay through Iraqi exiles the dubious credibility and also conjecture by ideologically moved Bush administration officials. Meanwhile, Clinton ignored information detailed by U.N. Inspectors, reports by independent strategy analysts, and also articles in reliable arms manage journals that challenged the administration’s claims.

She was also the only autonomous senator to make the absurd claim—strongly challenged by scholars, diplomats and also other observers—that the secular Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein was sustaining the Salafist Islamist Al-Qaeda movement. And an ext than a year after the U.S. Invasion and the bush administration"s acknowledgement the Iraq had neither any type of WMDs nor any kind of ties come Al-Qaeda, Clinton insisted it to be “the right vote,” adding “I nothing regret providing the president authority.

This raises pertains to that, together president, Clinton might again be willing to thoughtlessly accept likewise inaccurate and alarmist intelligence cases over more sober strategic analysis in making decisions on even if it is to go to war.

In fact, around 30 countries (including the united States) really do have chemical or organic weapons and/or atom programs through weapons potential, thereby raising the question as to how numerous of these countries Clinton, together president, would be willing to invade.

Stephen Zunes is a professor of politics and coordinator of center Eastern researches at the university of mountain Francisco.

See more: Easter Island Head Museum Of Natural History, Easter Island Moai Head

" src="" title="Zunes-Stephen1.jpg" />

Stephen Zunes

Stephen Zunes is a professor of national politics at the university of mountain Francisco and also a contributing editor the Tikkun. His most recent publication is "Western Sahara: War, Nationalism, and also Conflict Irresolution" (Syracuse college Press).