Yet an additional controversial tweet from Donald trumped prompted insurance claims that Hillary Clinton once favored punishment for the act.

You are watching: Did hillary clinton burn the flag

Published30 November 2016

Share on share on facebook on TwitterShare ~ above PinterestShare top top RedditShare via Email

*

Criminalizing flag-burning: totally criminal when by propose by trumped (2016) however somehow entirely cool as soon as proposed through Hillary (2005).

— man Schindler (
20committee) November 29, 2016Rumor: Hillary cosponsored senate invoice 1911 in 2005. Flag protection act recommending $100K fine and also a year in jail because that flag burners.
*

On 29 November 2016, President-elect Donald trump card tweeted a controversial opinion about the criminality the flag burning, leading to second rumors that his former political rival, Hillary Clinton, once supported criminalizing the act of protest.

In his tweet, Trump argued that “no one” should be permitted to burn the flag, including that offenders must be punished with losing their joined States citizenship or security a year in jail. Almost as conveniently as the debate started, other rumors erupted that in 2005, then-Senator Hillary Clinton sponsored a bill making flag burn an offense punishable by one year in jail or a fine of $100,000.

That bill (S.1911, The Flag protection Act that 2005) to be co-sponsored through Clinton, and proposed in part:

Any human being who shall intentionally threaten or intimidate any kind of person or group of persons by burning, or leading to to be burned, a flag the the United states shall it is in fined not more than $100,000, imprisoned for not an ext than 1 year, or both.

The regulation was not passed (or considered) by Congress. A vital New York Times editorial released on 7 December 2005 provided context for the proposal:

The invoice attempts to equate flag-burning through cross-burning, which the supreme Court, in a sensible and also carefully taken into consideration 2003 decision, said could be prosecuted under certain circumstances as a violation that civil civil liberties law. It’s a man comparison. Burn a cross is a distinct act because of that inextricable connection to the Ku Klux Klan and to anti-black violence and also intimidation. A black American that wakes approximately see a cross burning ~ above the former lawn has every ideal to feeling personally, and physically, threatened. Flag-burning has actually no such history. That has, in fact, no history of gift directed against any target yet the government.

See more: Did San Francisco Declare A State Of Emergency Over Coronavirus

As the editorial walk on come explain, Clinton’s justification for sponsoring the invoice was the concept that flag burning could be offered to intimidate or threaten American citizens. While the invoice was never ever passed, trump echoed its proposed $100,000 fine (although “loss the citizenship” was not had in the 2005 legislation).